World Teen - Main Article
Signup Teachers & Parents
Are Fossils Mineral Resources?
News Bytes 05/28/2020 14 Comments

A court has ruled in an epic duel: Dinosaur fossils aren’t minerals under state law, a divided Montana Supreme Court said Wednesday. The decision has implications in an ongoing legal battle over the ownership of millions of dollars of fossils unearthed on an eastern Montana ranch. (See “Dueling Dinosaurs in Court.”)

Lige and Mary Ann Murray own the surface rights and one-third of the mineral rights of the ranch near Jordan. Brothers Jerry and Bo Severson each own a third of the mineral rights on the ranch once owned by their father.

The dinosaurs unearthed on the ranch include a T. rex found in 2013, a triceratops skull discovered in 2011, and the 2006 discovery of a pair of dinosaurs that appeared to have been locked in battle when they died. The T. rex was sold for millions of dollars. The so-called “dueling dinosaurs” drew a bid of $5.5 million in a 2014 auction, but failed to reach the $6 million reserve price.

Before trying to sell the remarkable fossil, the Murrays claimed ownership. But the Seversons disagreed. They said they still held majority ownership because the fossils were “minerals,” like oil, or gold, or iron ore—resources generally mined as minerals from a property.

That’s what caused the human duel. The two parties have been to court multiple times over the last few years. A federal judge first said the fossils were the Murrays’. An appeals court overturned that ruling in 2018, saying, “No, they belong mostly to the Seversons.”

The Murrays appealed again. The Montana Supreme court says the dinosaurs are not covered under mineral rights but under surface rights—who owns the surface of the land. In this case, that’s the Murrays.

The case is still not over, however. It’s going back to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. A date hasn’t been set. It seems the distinction between surface and mineral rights is as clear as the mud the dinos fought to the death in.

(The “Dueling Dinosaurs” fossil is displayed in New York. The fossil is at the center of an ongoing court case about right of ownership. AP Photo/Seth Weinig, File)

Leave a comment
  • Be respectful of everyone, including other readers as well as individuals in the news stories. Disagree politely.
  • Do not post links to websites outside of WORLDteen.
  • Keep personal information such as full name, age, location, and contact information private.
  • Read your comment before posting to be sure you have typed what you wish to say in public.
Sorry you are not allowed to publish comments. If this is the first time you are seeing this message please log out and back in. If you continue to see this message and believe this to be in error please reach out to member services.

Most recent comments

1st Comment

This is crazy!!! They just want it for the money probably. Why don't just sell it to a museum?

I feel like surface rights

I feel like surface rights might count more. I mean, I don't know hardly anything about this stuff, but it seems to me that it would make more sense if whoever owns the land gets what they find on it. But that's just me :-)

I agree with Lena P.

I agree with Lena P.

@ Lena P

I agree.

This is Mylee

I agree as well. There is more important stuff than bones and it should belong to whose surface it was found on.

Ya and all this corona stuff

Ya and all this corona stuff it seems random I think it should go to a museum


Fifth paragraph, second sentence. "The two parties have been TWO court multiple times over the last few years."
That should be "TO court" not "TWO court".
The reason I'm capitalizing those two (haha) words is just for emphasis.


I have no idea. Are fossils minerals or not? Tricky question.

I know this is random but..

I know this is random but...So the launch of the NASA space thing has been postponed to the 30th (Saturday) because the weather was bad.

Kara N.

great find!!!

Kara N.

ok i mean you really paid attention to the article. i did not mean i was glad of a typo in the article. [ hopefully that makes sense:) sorry 4 any confusion ]

@Kara N

i saw that TWO!!! haha!

I think the person who owns

I think the person who owns the lend should get what is under it

Mind made up

I think i have made up my mind after thinking. I don't even know if fossils are minerals, but if someone owns the land, they should get what is on it.

Check out one of the interesting topics below
Explain IT!

Explain-IT trains you to understand the how’s and why’s of man-made inventions and ideas.

Learn More
Pop Smart

Pop! SMART provides tools that equip teenagers with the kinds of insights they need to wisely navigate today’s popular culture in a way that’s fun and engaging.

Learn More
Pie in the Sky

Everyone daydreams, and as it should be. Good dreams aside, our culture is a natural enemy of serenity and hope. God has equipped you for great things.

Learn More
People Mover

True stories are incredibly powerful. They bring meaning to our lives—communicating the truths we can’t afford to live without.

Learn More
Mud Room

Mud Room helps you relate to the news by exploring the details behind the stories in the headlines that relate to earth sciences.

Learn More
Globe Trek

Globe Trek will take you from the living room sofa to the mountains of Uzbekistan and from the screen of their smart phone to a Chilean plantation.

Learn More
Ka Ching!

ka-Ching! takes a look at important principles of money and economics through relatable examples from everyday life.

Learn More
Law 'N Order

Law ‘N Order captures your imagination through civics, focusing on the idea that everyone can make a difference in life.

Learn More

User login